Mauricio Rafael Rivas Castellanos (Discrimination)
Hi guys, today we have amazing topics to get on board furthermore let me introduce you guys this outstanding point that I have been developing under the discrimination tittle, and just let me give you out what is this about?
Let´s go ahead and mention that all this is about treating a person or group of people differently, especially in a worse way from the way in which you treat other people, because of their skin color, sex, sexuality and with no regrets from ourselves making them feel on the worst manner in life.
My opinion about this is that discrimination, has been intended or accomplished differential treatment of persons or social groups for reasons of certain generalized traits. The targets of discrimination are often minorities, but they may also be majorities, as black people were under levels of economy and wellness adding all good factors and accommodations in life. For the most part, discrimination results in some form of harm or disadvantage to the targeted persons or groups. An ever-growing number of terms have been coined to label forms of discrimination, such as racism, sexism, anti-Semitism, homophobia, transphobia, or cissexism (discrimination against transgender persons), classism (discrimination based on social class), lookism (discrimination based on physical appearance), and ableism (discrimination based on disability is one of the most dangerous due to some people who usually are victims do not have strong mindset, and they tend to kill themselves in different and fatal ways just because they think/ believe what other people are telling them is the real truth in their own life, which is totally wrong).
While intentional discrimination occurs at the level of individuals, institutional discrimination denotes explicit policies of social institutions that exclude, impede, or otherwise harm certain groups. Well-known examples are laws restricting the rights of racial or ethnic minorities or denying women the franchise. By contrast, structural (indirect) discrimination characterizes policies that are neutral in intent and implementation (race or class-neutral college admissions policies) but are nevertheless potentially harmful to minorities. Opponents of structural discrimination hold that states have an obligation to bring about equal life chances for all, a duty that entails proactive compensation (through affirmative action) by some institutions for the unequal treatment that minorities have experienced in the past or continue to experience in other social systems.
We have collected as well social-psychological explanations of discrimination based on social identity theory presume that humans rely on the groups they belong to for a part of their identity. Belonging to a group that is more prestigious and powerful than others boost one’s sense of self-esteem. Discrimination that entails debasing and impairing out-group members or denying them access to resources and wealth serves the purpose of strengthening the relative position of one’s in-group and indirectly boosts individual self-esteem. Empirical studies confirm that persons with a low sense of social recognition display more out-group devaluation and group-focused enmity based on an ideology of human inequality. Negative attitudes toward different out-groups (ethnic and religious minorities, women, and people who are disabled or homeless) are strongly correlated with each other, indicating the unspecific nature of discrimination and this is sadly lived cause of the results, the result is most likely to watch on the news new killed people by some criminals that hate those homeless people.
*The best recommendation that I could share for you to promote it, please treat everyone properly like you would love to be treated by others, does not matter the age, skin, gender, and culture just be kind and please, please be a real human being with each other to have a better community and world*
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario